Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Are you motivated to kill Islamic militants as they are to brutally murder you?

-Armed American civilians will face Muslim radicals

What is the exact US strategy for destroying ISIS and other radical Muslim groups? The Obama administration, whose policies have overseen an unprecedented expansion of Islamic Jihad, is certainly without one. In fact, a recent White House summit on “violent extremism” concluded, with zero specifics, that American “sovereign citizens” are a greater danger than the savages beheading and burning a Sharia path across Libya, Syria, Iraq, and soon likely Europe. *(1)

As I see it the tactical objective of free society's war against militant Islam is to retake their territorial gains by killing the jihadists in mass. However, the strategic objective, moderating the Islamic faith, is a far more demanding task that will take years if not generations to accomplish.

Islamic militants cannot be dissuaded or “rehabilitated.” Islamic jihad, which exists everywhere, is a global cancer that has to be cut off the face of the earth. As Americans we need to accept the reality that, whether military or civilian, we will be a part this war well beyond the end of Obama's reign and the destruction of one or two jihadist armies. All Americans must, therefore, be willing to combat militant Islam for the preservation of freedom and Western civilization. *(2)

As an armed American, are you prepared to stop an Islamic terror attack in your community? Have you talked to family and friends about the possibility of attacks by local Islamic radicals? Have you talked with your firearms instructors about "modifying the curriculum" to deal with more dynamic threats? If not, start talking and planning now. With Jihad's global facilitator as the incumbent executive until January 2017 it is likely, whether home grown or imported, American citizens will come face to face with violent Muslim radicals.

Consider Al Shabaab's recent threat to attack civilians at the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota. This is the same Somali terror group that killed 60 men, women, children, and infants at the West Gate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya on 21 September 2013. Do you think a "West Gate" could not happen at any shopping mall in the US? If so you have forgotten 9/11 and overlook that for over 140 years, from the American Revolution to the last Indian war, violent conflict was a constant on American soil. War, regardless of its causes, does not recognize concepts like “modern times” and quickly invalidates the “it can't happen here” idea commonly held by most Americans.

Reference Italy; a modern European nation. Currently, ISIS is threatening to invade Italy from the Libyan coast and burn Rome to the ground. After promising a resounding military response Italy's Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, realizing Italy has neither the means or resolve to fight ISIS, reconsidered and comically stated, “Our proposal is to wait for the U.N. Security Council. The strength of the U.N. is decidedly superior to that of the radical militias.”

Reading this I immediately recalled Micheal Savage saying, 'Italy has more men staring at their own butts in the mirror than it does manning the Italian military.' As an armed American, could you imagine depending on the “military” of the UN Security Council to save you from a rampaging Islamic death cult like ISIS? This, of course, would be funny if not so many lives were at risk. 

Obama's next two years will be dangerous times for America. Until January 2017 the US presidency, and all government agencies, will be administered by Marxist radicals sympathetic, if not outright helpful, to the growth of genocidal Islam and the continued destruction of American freedoms. 

Be armed. Be trained. Be prepared.

 
*(1) To Obama and his band of professorial Marxist a “sovereign citizen” is anyone whom owns a gun, reads the Bible, has a copy of the US Constitution, opposes illegal immigration, or did not vote Democrat in the November 2014 elections.

*(2) Due to the spread of academic socialism among Western political and learning institutions the modern-day meaning of “Western Civilization” could argumentatively be compressed to “Israel and members of the American Republican Party”.





Proposed BATFE Ban of M855 5.56x45mm Ammunition: My letter to law makers. (Copy, paste, and send to your federal congressional delegation!)


RE: Proposed BATFE Ban of M855 5.56x45mm (AR-15) Ammunition


Dear Senator                ,

The BATFE is planning to ban public consumption of M855 “Green Tip” 5.56x45mm (AR-15) ammunition under the false narrative it is “armor piercing” and, thus, a threat to law enforcement. The ATF's unconstitutional and extra-legal restriction on M855 has nothing to do with public safety or protection of law enforcement, but is another example of a paranoid government depriving Americans of property and freedom. 

There has never been an incident involving an attack on a member of law enforcement using M855 ammunition solely for the purpose of penetrating LEO body armor. Statistically criminals who use firearms against law enforcement are not knowledgeable enough about ammunition, or firearms, to distinguish M855 from, say, standard “Remington” .223 caliber hunting ammunition.

Furthermore, as the ATF is well aware, any standard 55 grain .223 caliber bullet can penetrate level II body armor worn by most law enforcement officers. Therefore, under the argumentation of the ATF's proposed M855 ban, no American citizen should have access to any ammunition caliber above .22 long rifle since since most rifle ammunition can penetrate police body armor and is “armor piercing” according to the ATF's incredibly low standard for AP ammunition. 

The true classification for “armor piercing” is ammunition developed to penetrate mechanized vehicles and barricades on the battlefield. The anti-gun lobby has perverted the meaning of “armor piercing” to include 'any ammunition that can penetrate law enforcement body armor,' which is virtually every form of rifle ammunition available to the public. 

M855 projectiles do not have characteristics of military spec small arms armor piercing ammunition, which include hardened steel, tungsten or tungsten carbide, depleted uranium, pyrophoric (or “self-sharpening on impact) cores, explosive or incendiary tips to aid in penetration, copper, or cupronickel jackets surrounding a “penetrator.” As with the ATF's recent import ban on Russian 7N6 ammunition, the goal of a M855 ban is obvious: 'ban the ammunition and the guns will follow.'

Why, in this era of increasing active shootings, violent crime, and Islamic terror attacks, is the ATF constantly working to make Americans less capable of protecting ourselves from criminal deadly force? Why is the ATF not an advocate for American freedom and Second Amendment rights? Why, in a society where criminals and terrorists commit crimes with firearms, does the ATF seek to punish legal and lawful American gun owners with never-ending bans and restrictions on guns and ammunition? 

Law enforcement officers, despite their importance in maintaining order in our communities, can only respond to, not prevent, attacks on innocent citizens. Federal law enforcement agencies should, therefore, encourage and enable Americans to become more capable of protecting ourselves, not constantly depriving us of the means to do so.
Please stop the ATF from banning civilian access to M855 5.56x45mm (AR-15) ammunition.

Sincerely,