End all Muslim Immigration to the West

Islam, in its current configuration, is a violent monotheistic religion completely incompatible with western civilization. Citizens of western nations will continue to be victims of Islamic mass murder unless western governments stop importing immigrants antithetical to and repulsed by our relatively free and open societies. 


The US and Europe, in addition to ending illegal border migration, must stop all Muslim immigration into the West until followers of Islam are, many years in the distant future, rational enough to integrate into democratic societies that prioritize personal liberty and individual discretion. 

 

Attacks in Brussels

Following every terror attack in the West, where the world's only violent teenage religion is to blame, Western politicians and national security professionals repeat exhausted narratives about enhancing, at the expense of our civil rights, the surveillance and police state, beefing up security networks, and retaliatory military intervention abroad, while ignoring the obvious, most effective solution to our domestic security problems with Islam; stop allowing Muslims into the United States and Europe.

 
Western governments could bomb the surface of Syria to glass, erasing any historical remnant of ISIS, with little to no effect on terrorist acts undertaken by jihadist in the US and Europe. 

Calls for more military action against ISIS in Syria, where westerners are not being murdered in transit stations and places of work, are understandable but, as a means of ending Islamic terrorism in western society, strategically shortsighted. 

 -Only western nations are expected to not enforce or even have borders.

 
This war is not a battle against an enumerable set of terrorist organizations. It is a violent ideological struggle between Western society and Islam. One the West will either win, and survive, or disastrously lose and be subjected to inhumane metaphysics from the seventh century. 

 
What good are the most powerful armies waging total war in every Islamic terror state on earth with so many Islamic radicals having infiltrated western countries and communities?

The media, policy makers, and intelligence agencies complicity pretend that defeating ISIS is a solution to terror attacks in the US and Europe. What they do not acknowledge is that this  multigenerational fight for cultural survival is not one simply against particular tactical elements of Islam. 

This war is a violent struggle against a diseased ideology embedded deep within our primary rival civilization. Those who say 'the West is not at war with Islam' do not understand, due to their PC "enlightenment", that Islam is most definitely at war with the West.  

The issue of how long Muslims will continue to commit acts of terror is a question of 'how long the Koran's most literal adherents believe their acts of terror are God's will? Since the answer is 'well beyond the lives of anyone reading this article' western society must alienate Muslims until Islam has internally moderated its most radical believers. 

 -Do Western policy makers want "soldiers of Islam" killing in Muslim lands, or killing in our lands?

Sequestering Muslims from the US and Europe is not a racial solution. Islam is a global system, not a religion limited to Arabs and Persians. Alienating Muslims from Western society is a security solution that will work for nations where implemented and fail for those that continue the path of political correctness and death.  

All Muslims, by choice or misfortune, are part of the problem. Faith in Islam is the vehicle in which these religiously-motivated mass murders against westerners are being committed. Non-violent, rational Muslims are also the solution to marginalizing their faith's literalists. The struggle, however, is one only for Muslims. The western world, that does not follow or propagate Islam, is not and should not be responsible for reforming Islam. 

Obamacare and Tax Season. An open letter to Congress (send to as many members as needed)

Happy, Happy, Happy!

Dear Representative/Senator (your rep), 

As millions of cash-strapped, over-taxed Americans receive fines this tax season for not having health coverage they cannot afford, I want to especially thank you for legally exempting yourself from the Obmacare health coverage mandate before, of course, shoving it down our throats. 

You and your congressional colleagues are to be commended for tireless efforts in destroying every remaining freedom in American society. 

Your self-serving political career and statist legacy is proof that Congress is truly an institution that has not performed a single measurable, productive act since the abolition of slavery and end of prohibition. 

Sincere thanks! 

(your name)

Run, Hide, Fight.... Die.

Role play of death: Four soon-to-be dead people, who could not run or hide, attack an active shooter armed with a rifle caliber SBR in this dangerously unhelpful training video from Houston, TX DHS.

Instead of "Carry, Train, Return Fire, Live" state and federal government agencies, in a no-matter-what effort to maintain the kill houses formerly known as gun free zones, are divesting millions of our tax dollars to teach government employees and educators the "Run, Hide, Fight" method of responding to active shooting attacks. 

The only equalizer in the face of pure evil is a gun. The only method of stopping an active shooter with a gun is a potential victim with a gun. (Sorry, were you expecting "fat guy with a fire extinguisher"?) This is why scores of heavily-armed SRT/HRT teams arrive on scenes of active shooting attacks, unfortunately to count and compile dead bodies for the ensuing investigation. 

Did I mention every active shooting since the 1950s, for the exception of two, has occurred in a gun free zone? 

Defend Apple and Tim Cook! My letter to federal reps. (copy, paste, and send)

Dear Representative/Senator (your rep) and Staff,

Please vehemently oppose and prevent the Obama administration's DOJ from gaining access to technology for the purpose of hacking Apple Corporation I-phones.

An Apple I-phone did not murder 14 people in San Bernardino, CA on 2 December 2015. Two non-state actor, lone wolf, self-activated ISLAMIC terrorists, one of whom should have never been allowed into the United States, operating in state-mandated gun free zone murdered 14 innocent people in San Bernardino, CA.

We the people demand a government from which we do not have to constantly defend our freedoms and civil liberties.

Sincerely,

(Your name)

Freedom Update: The loss of a constitutional hero. Justice Antonin Scalia

US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia famously said, "The Constitution is not a living organism. It is a legal document, and it says what it says and doesn't say what it doesn't say."

Justice Scalia understood that our founders never intended the Supreme Court, or any US court, to become an extra-legal legislative body. He spent thirty years on the highest bench preaching and practicing limits on judicial activism.

The Left, our mortal enemies in the ongoing struggle to reacquire freedoms exclusive to Americans, is celebrating the death of Justice Scalia today. They know his unexpected passing is Obama's chance to further dislodge this nation from its founding with, yet another, liberal Supreme Court appointee of his choosing.

Although Majority leader Mitch McConnell and other senators have pledged to not approve Justice Scalia's replacement until after the expiration of Obama's term, the American people have seen our share of disappointment and betrayal from both houses of this Republican Congress. 

This is why it is so very important to bombard our US senators with phone calls and emails, opposing an Obama SC appointee and prevent the US Constitution from becoming the "living, breathing organism" that says whatever the left wants it to say.

Below is a letter I have sent, over twenty times, to my US senators. Next week I will be saturating their front office staff and legislative assistants with phone calls to oppose Obama's push to appoint. Copy and send the letter below, if you like, but do something and do a lot of it. 

This appointment battle will wage throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, as Democrats decry the Republican Senate for refusing Obama's wishes, and will be as  pivotal as the post-Sandy Hood gun ban fight which, you recall, we won.

We are at war, in America, for our few remaining freedoms and wars are not won by fighting fair. Wars are won by taking advantage of unfair advantages.

Dear Senator (your rep),

Oppose with every fiber of your being Obama's chosen replacement for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia.

Barack Obama is the most anti-American political figure since Fidel Castro. Being allowed to appoint a justice to the US Supreme Court would be the death of what freedoms congressional Democrats and Republicans have not already aided Obama in destroying.

If you truly believe in natural human rights protected by the Supreme Law, it is your obligation to prevent confirmation of Justice Scalia's replacement until, at least, the conclusion of Obama's term in office. 

Sincerely, 

(your name) 

A Look at the US Economy: Inflation to the Rescue!

Repeat after me, "Inflation good! Deflation bad!" Now, say this mantra throughout every day of your life until you are sick at the sight of low gas prices, affordable mortgages, and interest rates that allow you to build wealth in savings accounts versus risking your financial future on the guidance of  central bankers and speculative market turmoil.

Then, and only then, will you be a good little Keynesian drone gleefully expecting government to, like all else, "fix the economy" when oil is not $130 a barrel, interest rates at record lows, or stocks at record highs. Oh, and to help you sleep at night, completely block from your mind the skyrocketing national debt, economic crises, and geopolitical instability caused by these inflationary policies. Zzzzzzz.....

If, on the other hand, you've noticed something is not quite right, that the economic deck is stacked against the most productive and hardest working people in the nation, relax. You're not crazy and, yes, it is a conspiracy. But don't vote for Bernie Sanders. Socialism sows the seeds of slavery and genocide. Put on your economic seat belt and read this:

https://mises.org/library/history-money-and-banking-united-states-colonial-era-world-war-ii

Do we have a "right" to own guns?

 

Is your right to "keep and bear arms" determined by the existence of the Second Amendment? If a majority of Supreme Court Justices ruled 'the Second Amendment does not protect an individual's right to possess firearms,' would you surrender your weapons -your personal property- to the nearest police station for immediate destruction? Or would refuse and fight to the death any attempt to confiscate your guns?

Many in the gun culture believe that any effort by federal or state government to confiscate our constitutionally-protected right to own firearms would result in an organized and violent resistance. Gun owners, after all, have the Supreme Law on our side.1  But what if the Bill of Rights was written out of existence? Do human rights no longer "legal" mean we no longer have human rights? Can we be jailed, abused, and murdered by a government that simply legislates away our rights? That would entirely depend on our compliance with or refusal to obey such laws. Moreover, it would depends on the ability to prevent such government abuse from ever occurring via possession of firearms.

Earlier this week I was in a meeting when the issue of Obama's "Executive Amnesty for Crime and Terrorism" (gun control) came up for discussion. An elected official in attendance remarked how Obama is attempting to expand definitions of mental illness so more Americans, e.g. veterans being treated for PTSD, can be denied their legally-protected access to firearms.2 Another person followed up with the comment that "such executive orders are violations of the Second Amendment," to which most agreed. 

Of course, I kindly reminded everyone that our ownership and possession of firearms is legally protected by the Second Amendment, but our right to guns is bestowed by virtue of our humanity. Total silence ensued. People looked at me as if I had publicly endorsed Hillary for president. For a moment I was confused by all the blank stares, but soon realized why the perplexed looks.

Generations of Americans have been conditioned, through years of government engineering, to believe that a civil right cannot exist unless written into law, and would cease to exist if  repealed by a legislature or court. 

To the contrary, human civil rights, such as the right to protect yourself from criminal deadly force with firearms (only firearms can defend against firearms), can never cease to exist simply because a government removes it from the document on which it was written. The Bill of Rights to the US Constitution are legal protections of your rights but it is not the reason your rights exist. Your human civil rights are either endowed by your creator (if you believe in creationism) or bestowed upon you, and absolute, by virtue of your humanity.

Although your legal right to keep and bear arms can, as the disastrous history of gun control demonstrates, be legislated out of existence, the human civil right to own and possess firearms, however, is unalienable and inalienable regardless of what laws exist to guarantee that right or are imposed to remove it.

Before "President Hillary" or a government of Yale University grads petition away your legally-protected rights, understand, and teach others to understand, that laws created by a legal or political process can never obviate natural laws regarding our human civil rights to life, liberty, and property; notably the ownership of firearms for protection from criminal deadly force.

1. As liberal anti-gun states like California and New York demonstrate, firearms do not need to be confiscated when constituents allow ownership of and access to guns legislated out of existence. 

2. Currently there is no nationally accepted clinical definition of what it means to be "mentally ill." Regarding legislation and public policy "mentally ill" is a political term with different meanings referencing state case laws. The progressive left, rest assured, would expand the definition of "mentally ill" to mean "any private citizen whom feels the need to own a gun."

The CNN 67% Poll

Aiding King Obama's push for a disarmed, fearful, and thus compliant society, CNN touted a poll, it conducted, claiming 67 percent of Americans support the King's illegal executive fiats on gun control despite the fact that not one measure of gun control can live beyond the committee process in either house of Congress. 

What CNN, and supporters of illegal executive orders, cannot and will not accept is that America is a Constitutional Republic based on the rule of law and separation of powers. Meaning, for you historically and legally illiterate liberals, we are a nation with a SINGLE legislative (that means law making) body, not a nation run by the desires of activist info networks and Marxist Alinskyites hoping to, one day, cart all political opposition off to labor and execution camps via rail cars. 

Obama Town Hall on Guns

Obama ganged up on by freedom lovers, and not liking it one bit.

Last night CNN, the nation's most anti-gun network (remember Piers Morgan?), teamed up with the nation's most autocratic ruler to sweet talk you into accepting eventual confiscation of all civilian-owned firearms in America. 

Were you convinced? Do you now, as a husband, wife, mom, or dad, feel guilty about owning firearms for the purpose of protecting your family? Do you, by the King's illegal executive fiat, now fear buying that .22 for your daughter's birthday or giving a Glock 19 to your dad whom still thinks revolvers are "the best guns for self defense"?

If not, King Obama, who was as articulate on gun control as a piss drunkard at a physics round table, did not accomplish his goal of readying your minds for confiscation.

Make no mistake, King Obama wants you to forfeit your guns, thus his constant friendly references to forcibly disarmed Australia and Britain (notice he no longer mentions gun-free France) while, simultaneously, attempting to convince you he 'simply wants a safer America via a few more background checks.' At least this time he didn't cry, this time.

"I'll take a bullet before you do, that's for damn sure." No Det. Jorge Lozano. You will not.

Forcibly unarmed, innocent citizens in state and federally-mandated gun free zones are victims of  active shooting attacks, not the police who, unfortunately, respond well after bodies of the aforementioned have been stacked.

Although Det. Jorge Lozano is likely an outstanding police officer protecting and serving his community, heroes are historically people who do things to save lives not people who say things that might save lives. 

No offense Officer Lozano, but you were wrapped up by the PC, feel-good culture that gave credit for a "heroic" symbolic act while 14 dead and 27 wounded bodies adjoined a gun free zone where no police or armed citizens were available to prevent or stop the carnage of an active shooting terrorist attack.