In
case there is doubt your natural human right to possess firearms of
your choosing is under constant attack, by protectionist crazies
believing you and your family are not entitled to self-defense from
criminal deadly force, look no further than the recent “wrongful
death” lawsuit struck down by Connecticut Superior Court Judge
Barbara Bellis.
The
dismissed lawsuit was filed by select families of the 14 December
2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in an effort to make gun
manufacturers liable for deaths “caused” by the guns they
produce. (1)
Despite being intellectually
bankrupt and void of standing the filing was a not a legal exercise of pure futility, but
one plaintiffs' council knew would fail due to a 2005 law protecting
gun makers from liability when their firearms are used in crimes.
This case was not filed for the purpose of winning a huge punitive ruling or settlement against Remington Arms, but to establish precedent for suing gun manufacturers and eventually overturning the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act under, say, a Hillary administration, or altering it enough to open a window for legitimate suits against gun makers.
Are
your NRA, GOA and other gun advocacy group dues paid
up? Can you make a contribution today?
Although
willing to fight in
the streets of America for our natural right to keep and bear arms we prefer to battle the forces of disarmament
in the courts and halls of congress.
1. A psychotic in a gun free zone is solely responsible for the deaths of 20 children and 6 teachers at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, not an inanimate AR15. Military
style rifles, such as the Bushmaster AR-15, are not made for the
purpose of taking innocent life but protecting it, which is why this model of rifle is pervasive among law enforcement, legally armed Americans, and the United States military.
