CPPA's Loomis Should Resign For Cleveland Open Carry Ban Request

Recently Stephen Loomis, President of the Cleveland Police Patrolman’s Association, called on Ohio Governor John Kasich to violate state law and United States supreme law by demanding a ban on open carry of firearms in Cleveland during this week's GOP convention. 

For years Loomis has been an advocate for law enforcement, not to mention a roaring critic of Obama's war on state and local police, however his emotions overpowered his brain, and his sworn duty to uphold and defend the US Constitution, when he promoted an executive order outlawing open carry in Cleveland. 

“I don't care if it's constitutional or not at this point,” Loomis said, also stating, “I want him [Gov. Kasich] to absolutely outlaw open carry in Cuyahoga County until this RNC is over.”

What Mr. Loomis overlooked, in his understandably emotional reaction to targeted killings of police in Dallas and Baton Rouge, is that no open carry demonstration in the United States has ever devolved into an active shooting incident. 

The Black Lives Matter terrorists who murdered police in Texas and Louisiana were not open carry demonstrators exercising their natural human right to possession of firearms. They were murders intent on defiling the very principles outlined in and protected by our constitution and Bill of Rights.

Loomis, by calling for an extralegal ban on open carry, promoted the very criminality he sought to prevent by demanding the legally-protected rights of American citizens, rights bestowed by virtue of our humanity not government, be sidelined for security purposes despite no active shootings associated with open carry or evidence of an imminent confrontation involving open carry demonstrations in Cleveland.

Although I am not an practitioner of open carry, for purposes of tactical efficiency, I strongly support Americans who exercise their liberty to demonstrate as armed citizens, just as I strongly support all five precepts of the First Amendment.

We cannot have a country based on human rights and the rule of law if we, as civilians, policy makers, and policy enforcers, do not understand that a usurpation of our natural rights, and laws protecting our natural rights, is a crime.

Stephen Loomis, as a senior advocate of law enforcement and law enforcement officers, has lost sight of what makes America special in the world and distinct in history of the world.

Black Lives Muslim Part One: Human Intelligence

On 10 May 2015 I submitted an article, "Lessons From Garland TX Attack: This is Only The Beginning", predicting violence and criminality under the Obama administration would skyrocket as the America-hating Marxist alinskyites in the executive branch sewed the seeds of illegal migration, Islamic proliferation, racial discontent, and gun control to intentionally place Americans and local law enforcement in danger for the purpose of "fundamentally transforming America". 

Those unwilling to acknowledge that Thursday's murder of five Dallas police officers was an integral part of Obama's "American transformation" are problematic and useless in regards to solving the problems of our Republic.

In this series of articles we will look at how the Black Lives Matter organization is evolving from an erroneous social justice movement, based on the fictitious themes of "Trayvon Martin and Micheal Brown murdered in cold blood," to an Islamic political action and terrorist organization backed by the well tentacled Muslim Brotherhood.

Before addressing specific threats Islam and the Obama administration pose to state and local law enforcement, thus American society and western civilization, we should first establish reasons irreconcilable differences exist between human beings and how those differences directly relate to human intelligence.

We know from statistics on intelligence that IQ in the Islamic and African worlds rank well below the Western world with average IQ of 67 to 87, compared to that of the US and Europe at 98 to 102.(1) 

This is not to say that people with lower intelligence are inferior, less important, or less capable than those with higher intelligence. One can be "smart" for reasons tied to upbringing and education, yet have lower than average intelligence. There are scores of people with average or below average intelligence earning more money and having more productive lives than people with higher IQ scores.

Effort, opportunity, and creating one's own luck determine how “successful” an individual can be compared to his peers.

On the broad social plain, however, higher levels of intelligence directly correlate with rationality, ingenuity, creativity, and income, not to mention willingness to take personal responsibility and cooperate in a diverse social construct without violating the interests, property, or bodies of others.(2)

Intelligence, or lack of, is one reason Islam, an irrational belief system that prohibits freedom and individual discretion, is primal among less intelligent Africans and people of the Middle East excluding, of course, Israel (Average IQ 95).

Christianity, for example, does not comprise of more rational, fewer violent people because it has been around hundreds of years more than Islam, but because it is a derivative of higher IQ European culture even though it shares geographic origins with Islam.

American race problems relating to social compatibility and domestic security are not, therefore, issues of skin color but genetics as it relates to human intelligence, ability, and  rationality vs irrationality. 

We know, for example, that black American males (average IQ 85), comprising of only six percent of the population, are more likely to have confrontations with police because they commit over 50 percent of crimes for which police are hired by the public to investigate, solve, and prevent. 

Blacks are not being arrested and incarcerated in disproportionate numbers because of their skin color, but because they are committing the majority of crimes which bring them into contact with law enforcement and the criminal justice system. 

Under the current social circumstances fewer black arrests and incarcerations could only result from a "fundamental transformation" of criminal statutes regarding federal and state definitions of crime.  

The United States, in other words, would see a massive reduction of imprisoned blacks and latinos if rape, assault, theft, and drugs became non-incarcerating offenses.

At what point do we, as a nation, stop pretending criminality, fatherless homes, poor single moms with multiple children, staggering drop out rates, failed inner city school systems, incompatibility of Low IQ illegal aliens and irrational Islamic migrants are tied to fabricated white racism and not cultural, genetic, and intellectual attributes? 

At what point does the United States develop a truly free society based on effort and ability instead of wasting trillions more on failed progressive social engineering projects and race quotas? 


The next installment will examine how the leaderless, mostly social media-generated Black Lives Matter movement is ripe for infiltration by the Muslim Brotherhood and what that means for local law enforcement and armed Americans. 


(1). Before stupidly dismissing this article as a promotion of "Nazi eugenics" note that European Jews, the race Nazi Socialism sought to eradicate from the European continent, have the highest average IQ on earth at 110 followed by east Asians with and average IQ of 107 to 102.

(2) Black, brown, and white people who commit crimes against others, as opposed to victimeless  crimes unrelated to public safety that merely "offend" the state, are measurably less intelligent that those who do not. Additionally, black communities are the most egregious violators of the Nonaggression Principle as the majority of crime committed by blacks is against blacks.