A Post Obama Era Perspective On Sandy Hook

Sandy Hook Elementary was on full lock down when the killer literally shot his way through the front entrance on 14 December 2012, gaining access to dozens of children and unarmed teachers.

15 December 2012 was the day after twenty children and six female educators were murdered in the federally-mandated gun free zone of Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

Four years ago today statist tyrants of the progressive left were giddy over their assumption gun ban legislation would sweep through congress, be signed by a president eager to disarm lawful Americans, and effectively erase the Second Amendment.

Months passed as our nation struggled with the magnitude of this unimaginable yet completely avoidable tragedy.

Instead of gun control, gun ownership proliferated throughout the nation as Americans overwhelmingly rejected our government's assertion that guns, not evil people, were the problem.

Regardless of their arguments progressive and statists could not convince the American people that disarming was conducive to our safety.

Instead of being repulsed by guns, as the left demanded, we took gun purchases to record highs after Sandy Hook, higher than any time during the gun crazed Obama years, as women gun owners became the fastest growing segment in the firearms industry.

Then came the 2016 Presidential election. With it the regurgitated mantra that Hillary Clinton, the nation's most anti-gun political dinosaur, would become the undisputed President-elect.

Gun culture braced for another war on our natural human rights to self defense from criminal deadly force. 

Progressives again sharpened their legislative pencils on the expectation Hillary would be President, only to be plowed under by the dreadnought of Donald Trump's America First agenda.

After the election freedom advocates breathed a sigh of relief that, for the second time since Sandy Hook, a civil war over guns and natural human rights was avoided.

Civilian and veteran-owned battle ready load outs of assault rifles, gun belts, plate carriers, DBAL, NODs, IFAKs and maxed out chest rigs were downgraded in 'threat level'.

Tactical shotguns came out of hiding to relieve AR and AK rifles as home invasions, not a war with the gun-grabbing Clinton administration, became the most likely criminal encounter for armed Americans.

The sociopolitical defeat of Hillary Clinton, and thousands of Marxist and Islamists she would have empowered, meant the threat of civil conflict over our natural human right to possess firearms was, at least for the moment, over.

Now, with Obama's illegal executive orders and political legacy facing summary execution by President Trump, gun owners have a rare opportunity to reclaim decades of transgressions against our rights, starting with an end to government-mandated kill houses known as "gun free zones".

Just as the Trump Administration is America's last opportunity to handicap progressive liberalism, by deporting millions of Democrat-voting illegals and non-citizens who hate America, it is also a chance, perhaps our last, to hold our incoming president to his word over ending the US government's unconstitutional ban on self defense wherever we, as free Americans in our free country, find ourselves.

Mitt Romney Still Wrong For America

Donald Trump choosing Mitt Romney as Secretary of State is the metaphorical equivalent of injecting cancer into an executive branch in remission from eight ruinous yeas of America's most anti-American president.

The political left loves Romney, and Trump's decision to consider him to head State. Democrats, after all, know there will be a massive schism between the foreign policy goals of the Trump White House and the implementation of those goals by a Romney State Department.

President Elect Trump cannot lead by trying to enact a Doris Kearns Goodwin novel. Not only does Romney epitomize the very institutional, pro-amnesty, globalist agenda Trump ran and won against, he is, and always will be, the failed presidential candidate who lost to, and allowed the full term of, this nation's most inept, corrupt, and traitorous chief executive.

Mitt Romney is a floundering buffoon whose only “gift” from the Trump administration should be a giant red “MAGA” hat to wear during national pro-Trump speeches he gives as a condition for being considered for a job he will never fill.

President Elect Trump must listen to the anti-Romney complaints of his staunchest supporters and not allow one of his biggest skeptics discretion over “Trumpian” foreign policy that was promised to be a complete departure from the global fiascos of Obama, both Clintons, and Bush.

Carry A Backup Gun?

$3 part shuts down $600 gun: broken slide lock spring (under the C) cuts short training with Gen 3 Glock 30. *

Interesting how many of us will bring two or more guns to a tactical weapons course, in case one breaks, keep loaded firearms strategically placed throughout our homes, top off every magazine we own, and have battle rattles for a moment’s notice (pay attention Hillary gun grabbers), yet carry one gun when armed in public where we are more likely to encounter criminal deadly force.

The Glock 30 pictured above has been a carry gun for thirteen years, running thousands of rounds without fail, until yesterday when its $3 slide lock spring broke on the 18^th round. A philosophical moment since, until then, I did not have a visceral attachment to  carrying a backup gun.

Guns break. That we know. Question for armed civilians and law enforcement carrying only one gun is, why do we plan for our guns to break at the range, during controlled training events, but not during life and death situations in public or on the job?
  

*$600 to $1000 generally gets you home with a quality pistol, meaning “Glock, Smith, or Sig”. After market modifications can run a few hundreds to thousands depending on shooter preferences.

Anti-Trump Evangelicals Welcome Hillary Presidency At Expense Of American Religious Freedoms

Anti-Trump opportunist of declining social influence, Glenn Beck.

Between the conveniently-timed emergence of female accusers and hopeless Mormon effort Evan McMullin, intraparty controversy over Donald Trump is becoming more bitter between evangelical Christians who support or vehemently oppose the Republican nominee. (1) 

The result has been a not insignificant number of evangelicals committing to vote for Hillary Clinton, by refusing to vote for Trump, based on their religious convictions without taking a close look at what they will lose if Clinton becomes President in January.

Under President Hillary evangelical Christians will persecuted as second class citizens. Islam, the "cool" religion among the secular progressive left, will experience unprecedented growth beyond, even, its already staggering gains throughout the US, while conservative Protestants gradually attain “hate group” status among liberal think tanks, executive agencies, and political surrogates of the Hillary Administration. (2) 

Needing trillions in taxes to fund economy-killing social programs, and reward her loyal base with government goodies, President Hillary will instruct her IRS to end tax exempt status for churches as pastors and congregations are called upon to “pay their fair share”. This will be a massive financial assault on small and medium churches vital to the predominately Republican-voting social fabric of rural and less urban American communities.

A Hillary Clinton administration will be a tenfold amplification of Obama's war on family-oriented, patriotic America while congressional Republicans, as demonstrated by the past eight years, facilitate another liberal, Alinskyite President ruling by unilateral executive discretion.

Self-appointed mouthpieces for the anti-Trump evangelical movement, such as Glen Beck and Jen Hatmaker, should note that Donald Trump, while not religious, is a proponent of Western religious freedom which he will protect from government, growing dominance of Islam, and infringement by progressive Supreme Court activists. 


1. Considering Utah electoral votes at stake Romney Mormons, by fielding another inept presidential candidate, could again "reward" the nation with a liberal Democrat president. 

2. Recall the brazen persecution of conservative and religious groups under Obama's IRS for which no offending IRS officials have been punished.

Anti Trump Republicans Welcome Another Clinton Administration

Many establishment Republicans claim, days before our country's most important election, they cannot bring themselves to support Donald Trump despite gleefully facilitating Obama's eight ruinous years as the nation's only America-hating Commander in Chief.

While the likes of Paul Ryan, Kelly Ayotte, and John McCain say their “principles” forbid them from supporting Trump, the reality is these institutional pariahs welcome a second Clinton Administration.

Anti-Trump Republicans look back to the Revolution of 1994, the non-stop investigations into Clinton scandals, appointment of independent prosecutors, grand juries, public outrage with Bill and Hillary's scumbaggery, and resulting backlash that turned state and federal governments, Democrat for generations, Republican. The 1990s were good for Republican legislators, all thanks to Clinton executive criminality and incompetence.

However, a 2017 Clinton administration will be drastically different than anti-Trump Republicans expect. Where Obama is the historical equivalent of Lenin, Hillary will be Stalin. (1) There will be no compromise with a President Hillary. Incumbent opposition will be eliminated. A Marxist-leaning, “organic” Supreme Court will be established. First, Second, and Fourth Amendment protections will be destroyed. (2)

Hillary Clinton's legacy in government is not one of negotiation, but corruption focused on self-enrichment and elimination of opponents, witnesses, and whistle blowers.

A President Hillary will abandon Obama's “modest” model of open borders, illegal immigration, and amnesty for the full-auto Merkel model of deluging America with millions of illiterate, Democrat-registered Muslims and Latinos.

This massive volume of uneducated and uneducable illegals, immigrants, and refugees will not only place unprecedented stress on our insolvent social welfare system, but overtake the already insufficient Republican voting demographic so no constitutional originalist will ever be elected to an office of national importance.

Unfortunately, the anti-Trump forces in the Republican party are too politically and historically illiterate to understand the next Clinton administration will not only involve the removal of their ideas and policies from American consciousness, but the permanent elimination of all political opposition and advent of a single party dictatorship.

1. Where Lenin was a communist ideologue that inspired and activated masses as a means to an end, Stalin was a brutal autocrat who believed himself the state. Hillary, like Stalin, will oppress to prevent the reemergence of political opposition.

2. A body of papal bureaucrats cannot “decide” citizens have or do not have natural human rights as listed in the Bill of Rights. It is citizens who willfully forfeit those rights, or fight to the death to keep them.

Clinton/Trump Debate Round 1

Donald Trump's round one debate performance was the stuff of nightmares for campaign managers. He was inarticulate, flustered, showed anger, bogged down on Iraq and birther comments, demonstrated no command of issues, and, on four occasions by my count, agreed with Clinton on policy points. 

 

Instead of attacking Hillary for being a habitual liar and career criminal, Trump tangled with Lester Holt, a network liberal and Clinton supporter, stayed on the defensive, and left the stage with his family in tow and tail between his legs. 

However, Trump is a proven master of political theater. He prefers being underestimated, written off, laughed at, and told he has no chance. This has been, remember, the central ingredient of his candidacy that displaced 16 professional politicians during the Republican primary.

Hillary Clinton, in the eyes of Trump, is simply another Jeb Bush/John Kasich 90s political regurgitation to be baited, trapped, and exposed as a repeated fraud on the electorate.

 

What does this have to do with active shooting mitigation, guns, and the Second Amendment? Nothing or everything, come 8 November, depending how Trump does in the next two debates where I expect he will decisively win.

What “Second Amendment People” Will Do

Shameless attention whore, total shitbag, and proud Hillary supporter Seddique Mateen.

Hillary shares multiple screen shots with the father of a gay jihadist who murdered 49 people in an Orlando nightclub, for which the progressive left blamed guns and homophobia, yet the top news story is 'Donald Trump telling American gun owners to assassinate Clinton and the Supreme Court if she becomes President'. Beyond crazy.

Obviously this level of head shaking media bias comes as no surprise to anyone paying attention to American politics over the last 30 years. Nonetheless, some attempt at objectivity would, at least, not make the media look so foolish in their persecution of Western and American civilization. 

Trump's comments on the Second Amendment

There are two types of gun owners in America. Those brainwashed to believe the Second Amendment "allows" them the legal right to possess and own firearms, and those who correctly understand the Second Amendment is a legal protection of our natural human right to defend ourselves with guns from all forms of violent aggression and criminal coercion.

Natural human rights cannot be granted or rescinded by the state. Such rights are bestowed upon us by virtue of our humanity and are completely and entirely inalienable.1

Killary and her mindless minions believe all rights and civil liberties are bestowed by the state, and can be removed by the state.

A President Hillary Clinton could influence enough of the judicial papacy to rule our human right to possess guns is no longer constitutional, but only Americans gun owners can decide to surrender that right to the state.

What does that mean? Allow me to clarify. Any attempt by the activist US Supreme Court -an extrajudicial legislative body and derivative of elitist Hamiltonianism- to obviate our natural human right to possess firearms will result in a war between Americans who are slaves to the state and Americans fighting to preserve freedom in the world's only remaining example of human liberty.2

That, in my opinion, was the point Trump ungraciously attempted to make during his North Carolina rally earlier today. 

Prison jumpsuit orange is so Hillary's color.

 

1. Whether anti-gun, pro-gun, or no gun one has to acknowledge the historical reality that Americans have never experienced the terror of  Nazi Brown Shirts or Soviet NKVD-types taking us from our homes in the dead of night -to be incarcerated, tortured, and executed- due to the fact that we, as American citizens, can be as well armed and trained as any federalized law enforcement agency.  

2. The "election" of Hillary Clinton -the OJ Simpson of American political culture and most criminalized individual to ever run for President- will result in various forms of tyranny, including the targeting of legally and peacefully armed Americans. Prepare yourselves accordingly. 

CPPA's Loomis Should Resign For Cleveland Open Carry Ban Request

Recently Stephen Loomis, President of the Cleveland Police Patrolman’s Association, called on Ohio Governor John Kasich to violate state law and United States supreme law by demanding a ban on open carry of firearms in Cleveland during this week's GOP convention. 

For years Loomis has been an advocate for law enforcement, not to mention a roaring critic of Obama's war on state and local police, however his emotions overpowered his brain, and his sworn duty to uphold and defend the US Constitution, when he promoted an executive order outlawing open carry in Cleveland. 

“I don't care if it's constitutional or not at this point,” Loomis said, also stating, “I want him [Gov. Kasich] to absolutely outlaw open carry in Cuyahoga County until this RNC is over.”

What Mr. Loomis overlooked, in his understandably emotional reaction to targeted killings of police in Dallas and Baton Rouge, is that no open carry demonstration in the United States has ever devolved into an active shooting incident. 

The Black Lives Matter terrorists who murdered police in Texas and Louisiana were not open carry demonstrators exercising their natural human right to possession of firearms. They were murders intent on defiling the very principles outlined in and protected by our constitution and Bill of Rights.

Loomis, by calling for an extralegal ban on open carry, promoted the very criminality he sought to prevent by demanding the legally-protected rights of American citizens, rights bestowed by virtue of our humanity not government, be sidelined for security purposes despite no active shootings associated with open carry or evidence of an imminent confrontation involving open carry demonstrations in Cleveland.

Although I am not an practitioner of open carry, for purposes of tactical efficiency, I strongly support Americans who exercise their liberty to demonstrate as armed citizens, just as I strongly support all five precepts of the First Amendment.

We cannot have a country based on human rights and the rule of law if we, as civilians, policy makers, and policy enforcers, do not understand that a usurpation of our natural rights, and laws protecting our natural rights, is a crime.

Stephen Loomis, as a senior advocate of law enforcement and law enforcement officers, has lost sight of what makes America special in the world and distinct in history of the world.

Welcome to Obamaland!

LE from multiple departments secure the scene after shooting of Baton Rouge police officers. 

Welcome to Obamaland. Admission is free but the rides will kill you. 

It is my sincere hope that law enforcement officials band together and prevent Barack Obama from setting foot near future memorial services for Baton Rouge police officers killed by a Black Lives Matter - Muslim Brotherhood - New Black Panther Party activist earlier this morning.

Jihadist Barack Obama is an enemy of state and local law enforcement who, everyday, risk their lives to protect and maintain order in our communities. 

Most Americans have no idea how lucky we are to have local law enforcement, as opposed to Obama's preferred federal LE, we do not have to bribe to get something done, get something back, or reacquire our freedom after being "extra-judiciously" detained.

Americans have the fortune of being able to dial 911, anywhere from a location of distress, and have police come to our aid with little regard for their own safety. This is an unbelievably rare and high standard compared to law enforcement practices in most parts of the world.

A word, also, for Republican Members of Congress: You are all culpable cowards for not impeaching the America-hating, Marxist alinskyite Obama. The blood of countless number of innocents around the world, including slain police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge, is on your hands.

Despite overwhelming evidence of criminality, and repeated demands by your constituency, no one in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has ever recommended impeachment of the most criminalized presidency in American history. 

Less related to the article, an interesting pic of a Baton Rouge LEO with an AR15/M16 A1. AR purist? Unable to determine if it is select fire, but he needs to close that dust cover.

Not “Radical” Islam. Islam

Disciples of Islam are at war with the West, laughing as our political leaders suggest more intelligence gathering and military intervention while Islamic operators freely move within the borders of Western nations they seek to destroy. 

Islam, the “religion of peace,” is the Nazi and Communist scourge of the twenty first century.(1) The Western world did not, in the previous century, set varying degrees for which one could be a “good” or “bad” Nazi or communist. Members of those collective tyrannies, as threats to human liberty, were killed and driven out of Western society.

There is no such thing, therefore, as portions of Islam being radical since all of Islam is radical as a globalized suppression of freedom and individual discretion. 

Although most Muslims are not physically violent, to the extent they participate in acts of terrorism, all Muslims subscribe to the Sunnah of Muhammad which does not allow coexistence with secular cultures or competing faiths and must culminate in the suppression of all non-Muslims by the sword or religious assimilation.

Our pandering political class must stop treating Islam like a legitimate religion and start treating it as the global parasite it was created to be before Islam's war on secular humanity consumes earth's few remnants of freedom.

The Gingrich Plan
Following the Islamic attack in Nice, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested the US government litmus test and deport all US-based Muslims subscribing to sharia law.

Gingrich is a great American, standing apart from most invertebrate politicians, but his solution to deport Muslims who believe in Sharia ignores the fact that no militant Islamist will profess allegiance to a belief that results in his or her removal from the “battlefield”.

The qualification for deporting Muslims, therefore, cannot only be based on a declared allegiance to sharia, but actions that threaten our domestic security. This, of course, means surveillance and infiltration of Muslim communities throughout the United States.(2) 

America's Muslim mitigation strategy must be carried out by the US criminal justice system to include a ban on Muslim immigration, deportation of Muslims who are not US citizens, and investigation, trial, and incarceration or execution of American Muslims facilitating jihad.

The alternative is do nothing and allow the continued mass murder of innocents by Islamic savages. America cannot be inclusive to the extent of its extinction. 

The Trump Plan
Donald Trump's plan to ban Muslims from nations exporting terrorism is counterintuitive in that it overlooks the thousands of Muslims residing within US borders willing to or already planning attacks on American citizens.(3) 

Trump's line of thinking also brings to light the costly pointlessness of military action in Syria and why immigration bans and deportation of Muslims is the better, and less bloody, choice for the Western world.

US and allied military could kill every living thing in Raqqa, turning the entire city to glass, with zero effect on Islamic attacks in America and Europe.

Our inner walls have been inundated by the enemy. American towns and cities have been flooded with Islam's soldiers by the very Western governments bombing their homelands to oblivion.

Islam is building its caliphates in Europe and the Unites States, not only in lands long ago lost to the perversions of Arabic culture. 
 

With millions of American Muslims, and Muslims in America, attempting to join ISIS or empathetic to Sharia and Islamic jihad, the US, itself, would ironically meet the criteria for Trump's immigration ban as a “key instigator of Islamic terrorism”.

How could we ban thousands of militant Muslims from the US already residing in the US? This returns us to the absurd concept of “good” and “bad” followers of Islam. 

All of Islam is “bad” in that it seeks destruction of Western values. All Muslims must, therefore, subscribe to an anti-Western ideology to follow the tenants of Islam.

Time to go
Is the segregation of Islam from the United States an extreme strategy that will create an entire segment of persecuted citizens within our nation? Yes, but so too were our dealings with British monarchical authoritarianism in the eighteenth century and the collective tyrannies of Nazi socialism and communism in the twentieth century.

Islam is at war with Western civilization and handily winning thanks to our naive proclivity for globalism, multiculturalism, and the suicidal utopian pursuit of equality. 

Either cultures go to extremes to survive challenges to their existence or they cease to exist. The choice for Western civilization is to fight the encroachment of Islam, or die. What will be our choice? 

"America will become a dictatorship”
It is an incorrect supposition that America's forced breakup with Islam will turn our nation toward tyranny. The existence of Islam within our nation is turning us toward tyranny. We did not become a dictatorship after the defeat and forced expulsion of the British Empire. 

We did not become an amalgamation of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, or Soviet Russia after defeating the ideologies of those nation's disastrous political experiments.

Like our eighteenth and twentieth century counterparts, Twenty first century Americans cannot be labeled tyrants when warring for freedom, liberty, and the preservation of our secular supreme law ("US Constitution" for you Obama supporters) anymore than the earliest Americans became tyrants for expelling monarchical absolutism from the shores of the thirteen colonies. 

The allied twentieth century wars against nationalism and communism targeted all of Nazi Socialism, Japanese Imperialism, and Soviet Communism. An approach that led to the overwhelming defeat of those deadly, parasitic ideologies wherever on the planet they managed a foothold.

Conclusion
Islam is completely incompatible with Western civilization's concepts of freedom and individual liberty (as France's 6.5 million Muslim population has repeatedly shown).(4) 

Muslims must be reintegrated into the Arabic and Persian worlds to find solutions to their political, economic, and theocratic differences for the sake of our domestic security and cultural preservation.

The Western world did not create the abomination of Islam and is not responsible for its existence or demise. Muslims are accountable for the normalization of their violent, irrational belief system which must be moderated, undoubtedly with tremendous amounts of blood, outside of Western lands.

(1) Islam's peace: Dead, one cannot be anymore “at peace”.

(2) Muslims immigrating to the West are not socially and economically integrating into society but creating segregated Islamic enclaves, Muslim territories within Western nations. 

(3) There are reportedly 3 to 3.5 million Muslims residing in the United States, according to government statistics. Of those 15 - 25% are considered "radical" by standards fronted by the US intelligence community.

(4) France, a nation of 66 million, has a Muslim population of 6.5 million, twice that of the US. This, of curse, according to dated, pre-refugee crisis 2014 statistics. Of France's 67,500 person prison population, 47,250 prisoners are Muslim (70%). Muslim incarceration rate per 100k people in France: 727.2 Muslims vs 34.0 non-Muslims. 63% of French citizens believe that Islam is not compatible with French values. So much for Western “democracy”.

NOT "ISIS". ISLAM

While awaiting a statement from President Obama, to blame guns and large trucks for the latest terror attack in France, distinguished members of the zombie media speculate on what "organization" will take credit for the murder of dozens celebrating Bastille Day in Nice. 

The only terror group responsible for these attacks is the one followed by 1.6 billion Muslims, and growing, throughout the world: Islam. 

Where there are Muslims there is Islamic terrorism. Where there are more Muslims, there is more Islamic terrorism. Where the are no Muslims there is still crime, tragedy, mass killings, and possible political violence, but there is not event, after event, after event of Islamic terrorism, to the extent the Western world is now experiencing, solely attributable to the mass importation of irrational, low IQ animals from humanity's biggest theistic mistake. 

Islam has no place in Western society. How many more innocent people have to die before moronic, liberal Western governments end their suicidal love affair with Muslims and Islam? 

Tell your political leaders stop trying to moderate genocidal Islam with our blood. Citizens of the Western world do not have an obligation to die for the politically correct intentions of multiculturalism, globalization, or the absurd and fatal utopian concept of equality. 

Black Lives Muslim Part One: Human Intelligence

On 10 May 2015 I submitted an article, "Lessons From Garland TX Attack: This is Only The Beginning", predicting violence and criminality under the Obama administration would skyrocket as the America-hating Marxist alinskyites in the executive branch sewed the seeds of illegal migration, Islamic proliferation, racial discontent, and gun control to intentionally place Americans and local law enforcement in danger for the purpose of "fundamentally transforming America". 

Those unwilling to acknowledge that Thursday's murder of five Dallas police officers was an integral part of Obama's "American transformation" are problematic and useless in regards to solving the problems of our Republic.

In this series of articles we will look at how the Black Lives Matter organization is evolving from an erroneous social justice movement, based on the fictitious themes of "Trayvon Martin and Micheal Brown murdered in cold blood," to an Islamic political action and terrorist organization backed by the well tentacled Muslim Brotherhood.

Before addressing specific threats Islam and the Obama administration pose to state and local law enforcement, thus American society and western civilization, we should first establish reasons irreconcilable differences exist between human beings and how those differences directly relate to human intelligence.

We know from statistics on intelligence that IQ in the Islamic and African worlds rank well below the Western world with average IQ of 67 to 87, compared to that of the US and Europe at 98 to 102.(1) 

This is not to say that people with lower intelligence are inferior, less important, or less capable than those with higher intelligence. One can be "smart" for reasons tied to upbringing and education, yet have lower than average intelligence. There are scores of people with average or below average intelligence earning more money and having more productive lives than people with higher IQ scores.

Effort, opportunity, and creating one's own luck determine how “successful” an individual can be compared to his peers.

On the broad social plain, however, higher levels of intelligence directly correlate with rationality, ingenuity, creativity, and income, not to mention willingness to take personal responsibility and cooperate in a diverse social construct without violating the interests, property, or bodies of others.(2)

Intelligence, or lack of, is one reason Islam, an irrational belief system that prohibits freedom and individual discretion, is primal among less intelligent Africans and people of the Middle East excluding, of course, Israel (Average IQ 95).

Christianity, for example, does not comprise of more rational, fewer violent people because it has been around hundreds of years more than Islam, but because it is a derivative of higher IQ European culture even though it shares geographic origins with Islam.

American race problems relating to social compatibility and domestic security are not, therefore, issues of skin color but genetics as it relates to human intelligence, ability, and  rationality vs irrationality. 

We know, for example, that black American males (average IQ 85), comprising of only six percent of the population, are more likely to have confrontations with police because they commit over 50 percent of crimes for which police are hired by the public to investigate, solve, and prevent. 

Blacks are not being arrested and incarcerated in disproportionate numbers because of their skin color, but because they are committing the majority of crimes which bring them into contact with law enforcement and the criminal justice system. 

Under the current social circumstances fewer black arrests and incarcerations could only result from a "fundamental transformation" of criminal statutes regarding federal and state definitions of crime.  

The United States, in other words, would see a massive reduction of imprisoned blacks and latinos if rape, assault, theft, and drugs became non-incarcerating offenses.

At what point do we, as a nation, stop pretending criminality, fatherless homes, poor single moms with multiple children, staggering drop out rates, failed inner city school systems, incompatibility of Low IQ illegal aliens and irrational Islamic migrants are tied to fabricated white racism and not cultural, genetic, and intellectual attributes? 

At what point does the United States develop a truly free society based on effort and ability instead of wasting trillions more on failed progressive social engineering projects and race quotas? 


The next installment will examine how the leaderless, mostly social media-generated Black Lives Matter movement is ripe for infiltration by the Muslim Brotherhood and what that means for local law enforcement and armed Americans. 


(1). Before stupidly dismissing this article as a promotion of "Nazi eugenics" note that European Jews, the race Nazi Socialism sought to eradicate from the European continent, have the highest average IQ on earth at 110 followed by east Asians with and average IQ of 107 to 102.

(2) Black, brown, and white people who commit crimes against others, as opposed to victimeless  crimes unrelated to public safety that merely "offend" the state, are measurably less intelligent that those who do not. Additionally, black communities are the most egregious violators of the Nonaggression Principle as the majority of crime committed by blacks is against blacks.

Liberals, Stop Crediting The NRA For Your Losses On Gun Control

 

Last week elderly Democrats littered the US House floor protesting their inability to extra-legally deprive Americans of protection from criminal deadly force with firearms. 

Most annoying about these Democrat displays of geriatric discontent, against public will, is their regurgitated theme of 'NRA holding insurmountable power over Republican members of Congress'. 

This misguided supposition overlooks how millions of gun-owning, freedom-loving Americans in firearms heritage, hunting, gun manufacturing, weapons and operations training, shooting sports, weapon accessories, and ammunition production mobilize into political action each time gun control is brought to a congressional committee or floor of the US House or Senate. 

So liberals, stop giving the NRA all of our credit. The NRA is a powerful voice in defeating your shameful efforts to permanently disarm the American public, but not the determining factor in Republican refusal to vote on gun control. 

The will and political activism of the gun-friendly American public deserves majority recognition for defeated progressive liberal efforts against guns, not simply the NRA.   

This Is My Rifle

This is my rifle, and yes it IS an assault weapon.  Why do I have it? To protect my family, my community, and my country. Protect from what, you ask? Whoever or whatever is stupid enough to threaten any of the aforementioned. Is it a weapon of war? Not unless pressed by idiotic progressive liberal tyrants who prefer disarming peaceful Americans to expelling Islamic savages. 

Any more dumb questions?

The Muslim And The Pulse (Part 2)

The Fight
Whether a shooting is conducted by a crazed dateless loser or an enraged Islamic import from an irrational low IQ part of the world the US government is in love with, your carry pistol, training, and willingness to live are the only things preventing your premature death and that of those targeted during an active shooting attack.

History has demonstrated hiding in a closet or bathroom, waiting for SWAT to stage up and save your ass, is a death sentence. If you cannot immediately escape the scene of an active shooting your best chance for survival is opposing armed deadly force with armed deadly force, despite fools like Gerarldo Rivera suggesting unarmed victims, with zero force on force training, physically oppose killers possessing indeterminable amounts of live ammunition.

Accepting active shooting mitigation advice from idiots like Mr. Dancing With The Stars will add your corpse to a overflowing morgue of well-ventilated bodies faster than you can ask, “what's the number for 911?”

If you want to survive an active shooting attack, carry a gun (reputable manufacturer's pistol) and train with the gun you carry. Or don't and work your jujitsu on 'battle rattle loaded out jihadi whose been planning his attack for six months.' 

This is not going to stop
The ASRP has been warning, for some time, Islamic attacks on American citizens will increase in frequency and severity, but the prediction is hardly clairvoyant considering the demographic calamity of our nation.

With around 3 million Muslims living in the US, a majority of who support Sharia law and detest Western civilization, terror attacks like Boston, San Bernardino, and Orlando will continue.

In addition to the Obama administration taking zero action against radical Muslims in and coming into America -the phylum they enlisted to destroy Western society- increased US military action against ISIS in Syria, Iraq, and Libya, will not weaken the threat of Islamic attacks in the States, but encourage radical US-based Muslims to conduct more violent operations.

I am not suggesting inaction against Islamic militants abroad, simply recognizing that we will, for generations, be involved in a hot war on US soil with soldiers of humanity's largest theocratic mistake unless openly radical Muslims in the US are significantly reduced by incarceration, deportation, and immigration bans. 

Gun control, not radical Muslim control, is the priority
Regardless of facts and government ineptitude surrounding every Islamic shooting attack, the political and media narrative always circles back to identity politics and the pressing need for, instead of controlling irrational low IQ Muslims, making Americans more vulnerable by restricting the guns we can own and places we can be armed.1

In reality, the left is so disgustingly sick, so painfully stupid, and, as a consequence, so reasonless, Obama himself could shoot up a preschool yelling "Allahu Akbar" and the first words out of his insane administration's mouth, and that of the Marxist  media, would be “more gun control.” 

Where guns are not available, jihadists will use knives, bombs, and vehicles to blow up and mow down crowds of innocents gathered for work or recreation. None of these realities, however, deter the psychotic left from pursuing the confiscation of your personal property and sole means of protecting yourself and family from violent involuntary death.

Obama, his DOJ, and many others directly involved in the inexplicable social mobility of Omar Mateen, make the highest levels of government so overwhelmingly culpable for what they purposely ignored and allowed to happen they may as well have, themselves, killed 49 people in Orlando early Sunday morning.

1. Long gone are days when educated immigrants wanting to legally, socially, and culturally become Americans are most prevalent at American ports and borders. Nowadays the deck is being intentionally stacked against Americans who love America with mostly low IQ immigrants that have nothing to offer our country but irrationality, hatred, and violence.