"When Does It Stop?" Berlin Terror Attack

It “stops” when progressive Western politicians, in love with Islam, cease allowing Muslims access to Western society.

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim, and Islam, since its founding, has been committed to destroying Western civilization.

No Islam, no Islamic terrorism. Not, at least, anywhere near the scale we have seen since the first World Trade Center attack in 1993.

To diminish Islamic violence in the West, Western nations must first dethrone liberal politicians facilitating, by way of their blind adoration for Islam, the spread of irrational, radical, often illiterate, low IQ Muslims throughout Europe and the United States. 

How goes the utopia of diversity and multicultural integration for Germany, Angela?  Not all "jihadists" are practicing Muslims. Many are foolish white liberals with autonomy over millions of helpless, unarmed citizens.

 

A Post Obama Era Perspective On Sandy Hook

Sandy Hook Elementary was on full lock down when the killer literally shot his way through the front entrance on 14 December 2012, gaining access to dozens of children and unarmed teachers.

15 December 2012 was the day after twenty children and six female educators were murdered in the federally-mandated gun free zone of Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

Four years ago today statist tyrants of the progressive left were giddy over their assumption gun ban legislation would sweep through congress, be signed by a president eager to disarm lawful Americans, and effectively erase the Second Amendment.

Months passed as our nation struggled with the magnitude of this unimaginable yet completely avoidable tragedy.

Instead of gun control, gun ownership proliferated throughout the nation as Americans overwhelmingly rejected our government's assertion that guns, not evil people, were the problem.

Regardless of their arguments progressive and statists could not convince the American people that disarming was conducive to our safety.

Instead of being repulsed by guns, as the left demanded, we took gun purchases to record highs after Sandy Hook, higher than any time during the gun crazed Obama years, as women gun owners became the fastest growing segment in the firearms industry.

Then came the 2016 Presidential election. With it the regurgitated mantra that Hillary Clinton, the nation's most anti-gun political dinosaur, would become the undisputed President-elect.

Gun culture braced for another war on our natural human rights to self defense from criminal deadly force. 

Progressives again sharpened their legislative pencils on the expectation Hillary would be President, only to be plowed under by the dreadnought of Donald Trump's America First agenda.

After the election freedom advocates breathed a sigh of relief that, for the second time since Sandy Hook, a civil war over guns and natural human rights was avoided.

Civilian and veteran-owned battle ready load outs of assault rifles, gun belts, plate carriers, DBAL, NODs, IFAKs and maxed out chest rigs were downgraded in 'threat level'.

Tactical shotguns came out of hiding to relieve AR and AK rifles as home invasions, not a war with the gun-grabbing Clinton administration, became the most likely criminal encounter for armed Americans.

The sociopolitical defeat of Hillary Clinton, and thousands of Marxist and Islamists she would have empowered, meant the threat of civil conflict over our natural human right to possess firearms was, at least for the moment, over.

Now, with Obama's illegal executive orders and political legacy facing summary execution by President Trump, gun owners have a rare opportunity to reclaim decades of transgressions against our rights, starting with an end to government-mandated kill houses known as "gun free zones".

Just as the Trump Administration is America's last opportunity to handicap progressive liberalism, by deporting millions of Democrat-voting illegals and non-citizens who hate America, it is also a chance, perhaps our last, to hold our incoming president to his word over ending the US government's unconstitutional ban on self defense wherever we, as free Americans in our free country, find ourselves.

Rule of Law Gone For Good In Hillary Presidency

Hillary Clinton is not running for President to serve in the capacity of its office, or for the historical accomplishment of becoming the nation's first female Commander In Chief. She is running for the land's highest office to stay out of prison in hopes that, by being elected, she can use the executive branch to purge the FBI, and colluding intelligence agencies, of those responsible for exposing her criminal activities.

Purge in the Planning Stages

CNN's Jake Tapper recently conducted a shameless pro-Clinton interview with Minnesota Senator Al Franken (Stuart Smalley) about James Comey being retained as FBI Director under President Clinton should she win on Tuesday (Comey's doomed FBI career will be the least of his problems if Hillary becomes President).

Franken replied that, under a Hillary administration, there would be investigations into the Bureau addressing 'political activism' exhibited by Comey, and other agents, prior to the Presidential election.

The obvious intent of these “investigations,” by a Democrat Senate under President Hillary, would not be to peruse justice, but ruin the careers and lives of FBI agents and intelligence operatives who exposed Hillary's criminal conduct at the State Department and beyond.

Once “activists agents” are purged and replaced with Clinton-loyal kleptocrats, the FBI would become the Hillary administration's federal police, persecuting “injustices” throughout the United States that conflict with her pathological ideology.

Hillary's purge of government agencies will be followed by a focus on patriotic, family-oriented America, Obama's principal target during his eight disastrous years, starting with armed civilians.

With no honest brokers in American federal law enforcement or the intelligence community congress will be blind to the criminal conduct of a presidency it is constitutionally obligated to oversee.  

 

The State Will Not Protect You: Munich Active Shooting Attack

Bavarian State Police armed with pistols and pistol caliber subguns flood the scene of an active shooting at Munich's Olympia-Einkaufszentrum on Friday. Up to 2300 federal and state police arrived on scene. Multiple weapon safety and tactical violations, from muzzle etiquette to spatial and situational awareness, ensued.

How are forced Muslim integration and strict gun control among the borderless nations of Europe working out for citizens of France, Belgium, and Germany?

The latest fallacy of government keeping us safe unfolded in Munich, Germany when 18-year-old Ali Sonboly took nine innocent, mostly young, lives with an “illegal” 9mm pistol at the Olympia shopping center on Friday 22 July 2016.

What is it about government banning something that makes it so available to the most volatile and vulnerable segments of society? There is not a teenager in America unable to acquire illegal marijuana, yet we never see teens inside liquor stores. There is not a legal means of purchasing firearms in the city of Chicago, yet it has the highest gun murder rate in the country. Neighboring “gun-friendly” Indiana's fault? Then why does not gun-friendly Indiana, or other pro-gun American states, have Chicago's gun violence?

Particularly sickening, about the Munich terror attack, is how the establishment political class and media stormed in to assure  panicked, unarmed citizens of Germany the shooter had, despite being an ethnic Persian, no ties to “radical Islam” or ISIS. Never mind the fact an investigation into the shooter and his rampage is still underway.

The pro-immigration, globalist proponents of open borders push narratives that Muslims flooding into Europe, where they do not belong, is perfectly normal and of no danger to Western society.

To the contrary Islam is completely incompatible with Western civilization. Where there are individual rights, freedoms, and civil liberties, Islam and its followers will destroy those natural human rights via political conquest, biological attrition, and mass murder.

How about it citizens of Europe? Is your rapidly growing 50 million-plus Muslim population becoming more of an asset or danger to your safety and way of life? Terror attacks correlated to the rapid growth of your Muslim communities indicate the latter. 

There is a sad and ironic correlation pertaining to Islam and Germany that no one in media has to fortitude or foresight to recognize. So called mainstream, non-radical Muslims are like the "good Germans" of the Nazi era. They are observant Muslims but, for the most part, go about their daily lives uninvolved with jihad, ISIS, or any other militant Islamic faction. 

But like the good Germans of the 1930s and 40s, the good Muslims of the modern era are not going to stop the genocide of innocent Westerners by their radical jihadist brethren. 

Just like the good Germans of Nazi Socialism, who stood by and watched a minority of German radicals murder millions across Europe, the good Muslims will be there, in Europe, living under tyranny when Western civilization is transformed into an Islamic caliphate by a minority of militant Muslims.  

Feminism embarrassing itself? Can you spot who should, and who should not, be in possession of a full-auto subgun in this picture? (Collapse the stock a bit, lean forward, drop your elbow, face to the receiver. You know, like the bald guy standing next to you. Do what he's doing.)

Not “Radical” Islam. Islam

Disciples of Islam are at war with the West, laughing as our political leaders suggest more intelligence gathering and military intervention while Islamic operators freely move within the borders of Western nations they seek to destroy. 

Islam, the “religion of peace,” is the Nazi and Communist scourge of the twenty first century.(1) The Western world did not, in the previous century, set varying degrees for which one could be a “good” or “bad” Nazi or communist. Members of those collective tyrannies, as threats to human liberty, were killed and driven out of Western society.

There is no such thing, therefore, as portions of Islam being radical since all of Islam is radical as a globalized suppression of freedom and individual discretion. 

Although most Muslims are not physically violent, to the extent they participate in acts of terrorism, all Muslims subscribe to the Sunnah of Muhammad which does not allow coexistence with secular cultures or competing faiths and must culminate in the suppression of all non-Muslims by the sword or religious assimilation.

Our pandering political class must stop treating Islam like a legitimate religion and start treating it as the global parasite it was created to be before Islam's war on secular humanity consumes earth's few remnants of freedom.

The Gingrich Plan
Following the Islamic attack in Nice, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested the US government litmus test and deport all US-based Muslims subscribing to sharia law.

Gingrich is a great American, standing apart from most invertebrate politicians, but his solution to deport Muslims who believe in Sharia ignores the fact that no militant Islamist will profess allegiance to a belief that results in his or her removal from the “battlefield”.

The qualification for deporting Muslims, therefore, cannot only be based on a declared allegiance to sharia, but actions that threaten our domestic security. This, of course, means surveillance and infiltration of Muslim communities throughout the United States.(2) 

America's Muslim mitigation strategy must be carried out by the US criminal justice system to include a ban on Muslim immigration, deportation of Muslims who are not US citizens, and investigation, trial, and incarceration or execution of American Muslims facilitating jihad.

The alternative is do nothing and allow the continued mass murder of innocents by Islamic savages. America cannot be inclusive to the extent of its extinction. 

The Trump Plan
Donald Trump's plan to ban Muslims from nations exporting terrorism is counterintuitive in that it overlooks the thousands of Muslims residing within US borders willing to or already planning attacks on American citizens.(3) 

Trump's line of thinking also brings to light the costly pointlessness of military action in Syria and why immigration bans and deportation of Muslims is the better, and less bloody, choice for the Western world.

US and allied military could kill every living thing in Raqqa, turning the entire city to glass, with zero effect on Islamic attacks in America and Europe.

Our inner walls have been inundated by the enemy. American towns and cities have been flooded with Islam's soldiers by the very Western governments bombing their homelands to oblivion.

Islam is building its caliphates in Europe and the Unites States, not only in lands long ago lost to the perversions of Arabic culture. 
 

With millions of American Muslims, and Muslims in America, attempting to join ISIS or empathetic to Sharia and Islamic jihad, the US, itself, would ironically meet the criteria for Trump's immigration ban as a “key instigator of Islamic terrorism”.

How could we ban thousands of militant Muslims from the US already residing in the US? This returns us to the absurd concept of “good” and “bad” followers of Islam. 

All of Islam is “bad” in that it seeks destruction of Western values. All Muslims must, therefore, subscribe to an anti-Western ideology to follow the tenants of Islam.

Time to go
Is the segregation of Islam from the United States an extreme strategy that will create an entire segment of persecuted citizens within our nation? Yes, but so too were our dealings with British monarchical authoritarianism in the eighteenth century and the collective tyrannies of Nazi socialism and communism in the twentieth century.

Islam is at war with Western civilization and handily winning thanks to our naive proclivity for globalism, multiculturalism, and the suicidal utopian pursuit of equality. 

Either cultures go to extremes to survive challenges to their existence or they cease to exist. The choice for Western civilization is to fight the encroachment of Islam, or die. What will be our choice? 

"America will become a dictatorship”
It is an incorrect supposition that America's forced breakup with Islam will turn our nation toward tyranny. The existence of Islam within our nation is turning us toward tyranny. We did not become a dictatorship after the defeat and forced expulsion of the British Empire. 

We did not become an amalgamation of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, or Soviet Russia after defeating the ideologies of those nation's disastrous political experiments.

Like our eighteenth and twentieth century counterparts, Twenty first century Americans cannot be labeled tyrants when warring for freedom, liberty, and the preservation of our secular supreme law ("US Constitution" for you Obama supporters) anymore than the earliest Americans became tyrants for expelling monarchical absolutism from the shores of the thirteen colonies. 

The allied twentieth century wars against nationalism and communism targeted all of Nazi Socialism, Japanese Imperialism, and Soviet Communism. An approach that led to the overwhelming defeat of those deadly, parasitic ideologies wherever on the planet they managed a foothold.

Conclusion
Islam is completely incompatible with Western civilization's concepts of freedom and individual liberty (as France's 6.5 million Muslim population has repeatedly shown).(4) 

Muslims must be reintegrated into the Arabic and Persian worlds to find solutions to their political, economic, and theocratic differences for the sake of our domestic security and cultural preservation.

The Western world did not create the abomination of Islam and is not responsible for its existence or demise. Muslims are accountable for the normalization of their violent, irrational belief system which must be moderated, undoubtedly with tremendous amounts of blood, outside of Western lands.

(1) Islam's peace: Dead, one cannot be anymore “at peace”.

(2) Muslims immigrating to the West are not socially and economically integrating into society but creating segregated Islamic enclaves, Muslim territories within Western nations. 

(3) There are reportedly 3 to 3.5 million Muslims residing in the United States, according to government statistics. Of those 15 - 25% are considered "radical" by standards fronted by the US intelligence community.

(4) France, a nation of 66 million, has a Muslim population of 6.5 million, twice that of the US. This, of curse, according to dated, pre-refugee crisis 2014 statistics. Of France's 67,500 person prison population, 47,250 prisoners are Muslim (70%). Muslim incarceration rate per 100k people in France: 727.2 Muslims vs 34.0 non-Muslims. 63% of French citizens believe that Islam is not compatible with French values. So much for Western “democracy”.

Liberals, Stop Crediting The NRA For Your Losses On Gun Control

 

Last week elderly Democrats littered the US House floor protesting their inability to extra-legally deprive Americans of protection from criminal deadly force with firearms. 

Most annoying about these Democrat displays of geriatric discontent, against public will, is their regurgitated theme of 'NRA holding insurmountable power over Republican members of Congress'. 

This misguided supposition overlooks how millions of gun-owning, freedom-loving Americans in firearms heritage, hunting, gun manufacturing, weapons and operations training, shooting sports, weapon accessories, and ammunition production mobilize into political action each time gun control is brought to a congressional committee or floor of the US House or Senate. 

So liberals, stop giving the NRA all of our credit. The NRA is a powerful voice in defeating your shameful efforts to permanently disarm the American public, but not the determining factor in Republican refusal to vote on gun control. 

The will and political activism of the gun-friendly American public deserves majority recognition for defeated progressive liberal efforts against guns, not simply the NRA.   

This Is My Rifle

This is my rifle, and yes it IS an assault weapon.  Why do I have it? To protect my family, my community, and my country. Protect from what, you ask? Whoever or whatever is stupid enough to threaten any of the aforementioned. Is it a weapon of war? Not unless pressed by idiotic progressive liberal tyrants who prefer disarming peaceful Americans to expelling Islamic savages. 

Any more dumb questions?

CALL TO ACTION! Gun Ban Legislation Incoming

Gun ban Democrats mouths are watering over Orlando

Starting Monday, 20 June 2016, every American who believes in the natural human right to self defense from criminal deadly force will have their liberty to own and possess firearms attacked by the lowest form of invertebrate as congressional Democrats push gun control and gun ban legislation in the wake of the Obama administration's orchestrated Orlando terror attack. 

Rest assured, no matter how pro-gun or conservative your state's US senators and representatives, this is a fight incumbent GOPers would rather forgo. 

To many Republican members of the House and Senate a government-controlled “no-fly, no-buy” terror watch list, where Americans are denied constitutionally-protected rights without due process, sounds like a good idea. What they overlook is how most registered Republican gun owners will be placed on, and unable to get off, that list 24 hours after its implementation. 

Obama's Alinskyite masses in government and the media have hijacked the narrative of “invited Islamic radicals running amok in western society" (where they do not belong) to a one of "outdated Second Amendment” and “easy access to guns".

Make no mistake, Democrats will use Orlando, and any attack on forcibly disarmed innocents, to make us more vulnerable to future attacks via bans on guns we can own and places we can be armed. More social violence and terrorism, in their book, means more funding and more government control over of our lives.1 

Corporate and government elites are far more afraid of bible-reading, patriotic, armed Americans than they are enraged Islamic psychopaths wanting to personally behead every non-Muslim on the planet.

Orlando is the left's golden opportunity to start a process of outright disarmament. Those thinking that supposition too extreme have no experience in Washington DC, are historically ignorant, intellectually dishonest, or mildly retarded.

Do everything possible to ensure the coming attempts at gun control are, like Sandy Hook, abysmal failures by bombarding your federal "representatives" with phone calls, letters, and emails. Do not let up pressure until your representatives commit to a resounding "NO" on gun bans, gun control, and unconstitutional non-fly terror watch lists.2 

Hold members of congress to their constitutional oath of protecting our rights to protect ourselves over making it easier for terrorists to murder us with the very weapons progressive liberals want made illegal. 

1. Florida, like most CCW states, does not allow armed citizens to possess firearms in business where the primary purpose is to sell alcohol; making every bar in the state a gun free zone. It is reasonable to assume not every person who frequents the "Pulse" or any nightclub/bar consumes alcohol. Why should CCW licensed citizens who do not drink be disarmed for being in the proximity of intoxicants? Do guns drink?

2. If our government was truly invested in keeping us safe it would promote an armed,trained society (Switzerland), regulate and police US borders, prevent, instead of promoting, illegal immigration, and not allow into our nation irrational, low IQ, radicalized foreigners supporting or plotting the destruction of America and its people. What we have is a political class and government allowing us to be harmed for the purpose of its funding and privileges.

Our "Representatives" No Longer Represent Us

Republicans love Obama!

Yesterday I called my Republican US Senators to demand they not support gun control legislation being opportunistically proposed by the crazed gun ban Democrats following the permitted Islamic terror attack in Orlando, Florida.

The front office staffer I spoke with at James Inhofe's office hung up on me when I suggested congress actually do something to protect America, and Western civilization, by not allowing people who hate and want to kill Americans into our country. She thought I was a racist for implying the US government police immigration to protect the American people.

With seven and one half years of Obama ruining the our nation with Marxism and low IQ immigrants antithetical to American culture, has the Republican congressional delegation, the so-called conservatives, done anything but enable the Obama administration in transforming the United States into a socialist, third-world hell hole?