A Post Obama Era Perspective On Sandy Hook

Sandy Hook Elementary was on full lock down when the killer literally shot his way through the front entrance on 14 December 2012, gaining access to dozens of children and unarmed teachers.

15 December 2012 was the day after twenty children and six female educators were murdered in the federally-mandated gun free zone of Sandy Hook Elementary School. 

Four years ago today statist tyrants of the progressive left were giddy over their assumption gun ban legislation would sweep through congress, be signed by a president eager to disarm lawful Americans, and effectively erase the Second Amendment.

Months passed as our nation struggled with the magnitude of this unimaginable yet completely avoidable tragedy.

Instead of gun control, gun ownership proliferated throughout the nation as Americans overwhelmingly rejected our government's assertion that guns, not evil people, were the problem.

Regardless of their arguments progressive and statists could not convince the American people that disarming was conducive to our safety.

Instead of being repulsed by guns, as the left demanded, we took gun purchases to record highs after Sandy Hook, higher than any time during the gun crazed Obama years, as women gun owners became the fastest growing segment in the firearms industry.

Then came the 2016 Presidential election. With it the regurgitated mantra that Hillary Clinton, the nation's most anti-gun political dinosaur, would become the undisputed President-elect.

Gun culture braced for another war on our natural human rights to self defense from criminal deadly force. 

Progressives again sharpened their legislative pencils on the expectation Hillary would be President, only to be plowed under by the dreadnought of Donald Trump's America First agenda.

After the election freedom advocates breathed a sigh of relief that, for the second time since Sandy Hook, a civil war over guns and natural human rights was avoided.

Civilian and veteran-owned battle ready load outs of assault rifles, gun belts, plate carriers, DBAL, NODs, IFAKs and maxed out chest rigs were downgraded in 'threat level'.

Tactical shotguns came out of hiding to relieve AR and AK rifles as home invasions, not a war with the gun-grabbing Clinton administration, became the most likely criminal encounter for armed Americans.

The sociopolitical defeat of Hillary Clinton, and thousands of Marxist and Islamists she would have empowered, meant the threat of civil conflict over our natural human right to possess firearms was, at least for the moment, over.

Now, with Obama's illegal executive orders and political legacy facing summary execution by President Trump, gun owners have a rare opportunity to reclaim decades of transgressions against our rights, starting with an end to government-mandated kill houses known as "gun free zones".

Just as the Trump Administration is America's last opportunity to handicap progressive liberalism, by deporting millions of Democrat-voting illegals and non-citizens who hate America, it is also a chance, perhaps our last, to hold our incoming president to his word over ending the US government's unconstitutional ban on self defense wherever we, as free Americans in our free country, find ourselves.

RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA!

Pictured: Vladimir Lenin banishing the "institutionalists" of his era, only to replace Tsarists rule with the abysmal political theories of Marx.

In case you haven't heard, from every fake news outlet with some remnant of viewership, the 'Russian Federation hacked the 2016 Presidential election in favor of Donald Trump'.

In response, the crusty old farts of the establishment we, not the Russians, hired Trump to dispose of are demanding an investigation into Russian hacking, warning "reports of meddling from Vladimir Putin's government should alarm every American.”

What the obsolete media and crusty old farts of the establishment are instead getting is Americans alarmed these idiotic and completely unconvincing fairy tales about Russian interference into our electoral process still reside on the lips of the political class and “news” personalities, despite the beating they took in November for espousing similar lunacy. 

Clinton/Trump Debate Round 3

I have supported, and continue to support, Donald Trump from the moment he pledged to abolish gun free zones, remove illegal aliens from the United States, and construct a working border with Mexico. 

However, his performance during the final presidential debate was not only worse than his first, it could very well place the Republic’s future under control of Hillary Clinton and her army of globalist kleptocrats.

The third debate was Trump's final opportunity to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her life of self service, felonious dissemination of US intelligence operations, criminal disregard for the rule of law, and visceral hatred of humanity. It was his last chance to make 72 million viewers aware of how and why Hillary Clinton is pure evil, but he failed by reverting to the defensive armature we saw in debate one.

Trump was overwhelmed by a rehearsed Clinton in debate three. Far from controlling and off-basing Hillary, which he did in debate two, Trump appeared easily angered and unpresidential before the largest audience of voters he will have before election day.

In addition to a serious lack of political instincts, Trump called our country “stupid” for the idiocy of current and preceding administrations, where he should have distinguished between the nobility of our country and the stupidity and lawlessness of our leaders.

Trump showed his unhinged side by going into another “good job Hillary” rant, which made him look flustered, unprofessional, and easily provoked.

Last, his “such a nasty woman” comment was a fatal nail in his last chance to nationally obviate Hillary from the presidential race. Childishly calling Clinton names was an inexcusable alternative to shaming her life of crime.  

Trump failed his fiduciary obligation to put the nation's most criminal politician on pubic trial Wednesday night simply because he did not prepare and confront Hillary with a rehearsed, prosecutorial tone. (1)

 

1. Trump's third debate performance was so bad, in fact, conservative social media and talk radio spent the following Thursday and Friday rushing to his rescue 'clarifying what he meant' during the debate. 

 

Trump Clinton Debate Round 2

Trump expectantly, and decidedly, won debate number two on Sunday night with three key talking points.

One, he shut down an elongated expedition into his leaked “hot mic” episode by staffing the debate audience with Bill and Hillary's former female sexual assault victims.

Two, He addressed the criminality of Hillary's dissemination of US state secrets by commenting she would be in jail (he meant prison) under a Trump administration. 
 

Three, he pointed out that Hillary, by calling Trump supporters irredeemable deplorables, has extreme hatred in her heart. 

Anyone who worked near 1600 Pennsylvania in the 1990s knows Hillary has extreme hatred of humanity; Stalin's principal characteristic. 

Clinton/Trump Debate Round 1

Donald Trump's round one debate performance was the stuff of nightmares for campaign managers. He was inarticulate, flustered, showed anger, bogged down on Iraq and birther comments, demonstrated no command of issues, and, on four occasions by my count, agreed with Clinton on policy points. 

 

Instead of attacking Hillary for being a habitual liar and career criminal, Trump tangled with Lester Holt, a network liberal and Clinton supporter, stayed on the defensive, and left the stage with his family in tow and tail between his legs. 

However, Trump is a proven master of political theater. He prefers being underestimated, written off, laughed at, and told he has no chance. This has been, remember, the central ingredient of his candidacy that displaced 16 professional politicians during the Republican primary.

Hillary Clinton, in the eyes of Trump, is simply another Jeb Bush/John Kasich 90s political regurgitation to be baited, trapped, and exposed as a repeated fraud on the electorate.

 

What does this have to do with active shooting mitigation, guns, and the Second Amendment? Nothing or everything, come 8 November, depending how Trump does in the next two debates where I expect he will decisively win.

What “Second Amendment People” Will Do

Shameless attention whore, total shitbag, and proud Hillary supporter Seddique Mateen.

Hillary shares multiple screen shots with the father of a gay jihadist who murdered 49 people in an Orlando nightclub, for which the progressive left blamed guns and homophobia, yet the top news story is 'Donald Trump telling American gun owners to assassinate Clinton and the Supreme Court if she becomes President'. Beyond crazy.

Obviously this level of head shaking media bias comes as no surprise to anyone paying attention to American politics over the last 30 years. Nonetheless, some attempt at objectivity would, at least, not make the media look so foolish in their persecution of Western and American civilization. 

Trump's comments on the Second Amendment

There are two types of gun owners in America. Those brainwashed to believe the Second Amendment "allows" them the legal right to possess and own firearms, and those who correctly understand the Second Amendment is a legal protection of our natural human right to defend ourselves with guns from all forms of violent aggression and criminal coercion.

Natural human rights cannot be granted or rescinded by the state. Such rights are bestowed upon us by virtue of our humanity and are completely and entirely inalienable.1

Killary and her mindless minions believe all rights and civil liberties are bestowed by the state, and can be removed by the state.

A President Hillary Clinton could influence enough of the judicial papacy to rule our human right to possess guns is no longer constitutional, but only Americans gun owners can decide to surrender that right to the state.

What does that mean? Allow me to clarify. Any attempt by the activist US Supreme Court -an extrajudicial legislative body and derivative of elitist Hamiltonianism- to obviate our natural human right to possess firearms will result in a war between Americans who are slaves to the state and Americans fighting to preserve freedom in the world's only remaining example of human liberty.2

That, in my opinion, was the point Trump ungraciously attempted to make during his North Carolina rally earlier today. 

Prison jumpsuit orange is so Hillary's color.

 

1. Whether anti-gun, pro-gun, or no gun one has to acknowledge the historical reality that Americans have never experienced the terror of  Nazi Brown Shirts or Soviet NKVD-types taking us from our homes in the dead of night -to be incarcerated, tortured, and executed- due to the fact that we, as American citizens, can be as well armed and trained as any federalized law enforcement agency.  

2. The "election" of Hillary Clinton -the OJ Simpson of American political culture and most criminalized individual to ever run for President- will result in various forms of tyranny, including the targeting of legally and peacefully armed Americans. Prepare yourselves accordingly.