Clinton/Trump Debate Round 3

I have supported, and continue to support, Donald Trump from the moment he pledged to abolish gun free zones, remove illegal aliens from the United States, and construct a working border with Mexico. 

However, his performance during the final presidential debate was not only worse than his first, it could very well place the Republic’s future under control of Hillary Clinton and her army of globalist kleptocrats.

The third debate was Trump's final opportunity to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her life of self service, felonious dissemination of US intelligence operations, criminal disregard for the rule of law, and visceral hatred of humanity. It was his last chance to make 72 million viewers aware of how and why Hillary Clinton is pure evil, but he failed by reverting to the defensive armature we saw in debate one.

Trump was overwhelmed by a rehearsed Clinton in debate three. Far from controlling and off-basing Hillary, which he did in debate two, Trump appeared easily angered and unpresidential before the largest audience of voters he will have before election day.

In addition to a serious lack of political instincts, Trump called our country “stupid” for the idiocy of current and preceding administrations, where he should have distinguished between the nobility of our country and the stupidity and lawlessness of our leaders.

Trump showed his unhinged side by going into another “good job Hillary” rant, which made him look flustered, unprofessional, and easily provoked.

Last, his “such a nasty woman” comment was a fatal nail in his last chance to nationally obviate Hillary from the presidential race. Childishly calling Clinton names was an inexcusable alternative to shaming her life of crime.  

Trump failed his fiduciary obligation to put the nation's most criminal politician on pubic trial Wednesday night simply because he did not prepare and confront Hillary with a rehearsed, prosecutorial tone. (1)

 

1. Trump's third debate performance was so bad, in fact, conservative social media and talk radio spent the following Thursday and Friday rushing to his rescue 'clarifying what he meant' during the debate. 

 

Anti-Trump Evangelicals Welcome Hillary Presidency At Expense Of American Religious Freedoms

Anti-Trump opportunist of declining social influence, Glenn Beck.

Between the conveniently-timed emergence of female accusers and hopeless Mormon effort Evan McMullin, intraparty controversy over Donald Trump is becoming more bitter between evangelical Christians who support or vehemently oppose the Republican nominee. (1) 

The result has been a not insignificant number of evangelicals committing to vote for Hillary Clinton, by refusing to vote for Trump, based on their religious convictions without taking a close look at what they will lose if Clinton becomes President in January.

Under President Hillary evangelical Christians will persecuted as second class citizens. Islam, the "cool" religion among the secular progressive left, will experience unprecedented growth beyond, even, its already staggering gains throughout the US, while conservative Protestants gradually attain “hate group” status among liberal think tanks, executive agencies, and political surrogates of the Hillary Administration. (2) 

Needing trillions in taxes to fund economy-killing social programs, and reward her loyal base with government goodies, President Hillary will instruct her IRS to end tax exempt status for churches as pastors and congregations are called upon to “pay their fair share”. This will be a massive financial assault on small and medium churches vital to the predominately Republican-voting social fabric of rural and less urban American communities.

A Hillary Clinton administration will be a tenfold amplification of Obama's war on family-oriented, patriotic America while congressional Republicans, as demonstrated by the past eight years, facilitate another liberal, Alinskyite President ruling by unilateral executive discretion.

Self-appointed mouthpieces for the anti-Trump evangelical movement, such as Glen Beck and Jen Hatmaker, should note that Donald Trump, while not religious, is a proponent of Western religious freedom which he will protect from government, growing dominance of Islam, and infringement by progressive Supreme Court activists. 


1. Considering Utah electoral votes at stake Romney Mormons, by fielding another inept presidential candidate, could again "reward" the nation with a liberal Democrat president. 

2. Recall the brazen persecution of conservative and religious groups under Obama's IRS for which no offending IRS officials have been punished.