"When Does It Stop?" Berlin Terror Attack

It “stops” when progressive Western politicians, in love with Islam, cease allowing Muslims access to Western society.

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim, and Islam, since its founding, has been committed to destroying Western civilization.

No Islam, no Islamic terrorism. Not, at least, anywhere near the scale we have seen since the first World Trade Center attack in 1993.

To diminish Islamic violence in the West, Western nations must first dethrone liberal politicians facilitating, by way of their blind adoration for Islam, the spread of irrational, radical, often illiterate, low IQ Muslims throughout Europe and the United States. 

How goes the utopia of diversity and multicultural integration for Germany, Angela?  Not all "jihadists" are practicing Muslims. Many are foolish white liberals with autonomy over millions of helpless, unarmed citizens.

 

The State Will Not Protect You: Munich Active Shooting Attack

Bavarian State Police armed with pistols and pistol caliber subguns flood the scene of an active shooting at Munich's Olympia-Einkaufszentrum on Friday. Up to 2300 federal and state police arrived on scene. Multiple weapon safety and tactical violations, from muzzle etiquette to spatial and situational awareness, ensued.

How are forced Muslim integration and strict gun control among the borderless nations of Europe working out for citizens of France, Belgium, and Germany?

The latest fallacy of government keeping us safe unfolded in Munich, Germany when 18-year-old Ali Sonboly took nine innocent, mostly young, lives with an “illegal” 9mm pistol at the Olympia shopping center on Friday 22 July 2016.

What is it about government banning something that makes it so available to the most volatile and vulnerable segments of society? There is not a teenager in America unable to acquire illegal marijuana, yet we never see teens inside liquor stores. There is not a legal means of purchasing firearms in the city of Chicago, yet it has the highest gun murder rate in the country. Neighboring “gun-friendly” Indiana's fault? Then why does not gun-friendly Indiana, or other pro-gun American states, have Chicago's gun violence?

Particularly sickening, about the Munich terror attack, is how the establishment political class and media stormed in to assure  panicked, unarmed citizens of Germany the shooter had, despite being an ethnic Persian, no ties to “radical Islam” or ISIS. Never mind the fact an investigation into the shooter and his rampage is still underway.

The pro-immigration, globalist proponents of open borders push narratives that Muslims flooding into Europe, where they do not belong, is perfectly normal and of no danger to Western society.

To the contrary Islam is completely incompatible with Western civilization. Where there are individual rights, freedoms, and civil liberties, Islam and its followers will destroy those natural human rights via political conquest, biological attrition, and mass murder.

How about it citizens of Europe? Is your rapidly growing 50 million-plus Muslim population becoming more of an asset or danger to your safety and way of life? Terror attacks correlated to the rapid growth of your Muslim communities indicate the latter. 

There is a sad and ironic correlation pertaining to Islam and Germany that no one in media has to fortitude or foresight to recognize. So called mainstream, non-radical Muslims are like the "good Germans" of the Nazi era. They are observant Muslims but, for the most part, go about their daily lives uninvolved with jihad, ISIS, or any other militant Islamic faction. 

But like the good Germans of the 1930s and 40s, the good Muslims of the modern era are not going to stop the genocide of innocent Westerners by their radical jihadist brethren. 

Just like the good Germans of Nazi Socialism, who stood by and watched a minority of German radicals murder millions across Europe, the good Muslims will be there, in Europe, living under tyranny when Western civilization is transformed into an Islamic caliphate by a minority of militant Muslims.  

Feminism embarrassing itself? Can you spot who should, and who should not, be in possession of a full-auto subgun in this picture? (Collapse the stock a bit, lean forward, drop your elbow, face to the receiver. You know, like the bald guy standing next to you. Do what he's doing.)

Not “Radical” Islam. Islam

Disciples of Islam are at war with the West, laughing as our political leaders suggest more intelligence gathering and military intervention while Islamic operators freely move within the borders of Western nations they seek to destroy. 

Islam, the “religion of peace,” is the Nazi and Communist scourge of the twenty first century.(1) The Western world did not, in the previous century, set varying degrees for which one could be a “good” or “bad” Nazi or communist. Members of those collective tyrannies, as threats to human liberty, were killed and driven out of Western society.

There is no such thing, therefore, as portions of Islam being radical since all of Islam is radical as a globalized suppression of freedom and individual discretion. 

Although most Muslims are not physically violent, to the extent they participate in acts of terrorism, all Muslims subscribe to the Sunnah of Muhammad which does not allow coexistence with secular cultures or competing faiths and must culminate in the suppression of all non-Muslims by the sword or religious assimilation.

Our pandering political class must stop treating Islam like a legitimate religion and start treating it as the global parasite it was created to be before Islam's war on secular humanity consumes earth's few remnants of freedom.

The Gingrich Plan
Following the Islamic attack in Nice, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested the US government litmus test and deport all US-based Muslims subscribing to sharia law.

Gingrich is a great American, standing apart from most invertebrate politicians, but his solution to deport Muslims who believe in Sharia ignores the fact that no militant Islamist will profess allegiance to a belief that results in his or her removal from the “battlefield”.

The qualification for deporting Muslims, therefore, cannot only be based on a declared allegiance to sharia, but actions that threaten our domestic security. This, of course, means surveillance and infiltration of Muslim communities throughout the United States.(2) 

America's Muslim mitigation strategy must be carried out by the US criminal justice system to include a ban on Muslim immigration, deportation of Muslims who are not US citizens, and investigation, trial, and incarceration or execution of American Muslims facilitating jihad.

The alternative is do nothing and allow the continued mass murder of innocents by Islamic savages. America cannot be inclusive to the extent of its extinction. 

The Trump Plan
Donald Trump's plan to ban Muslims from nations exporting terrorism is counterintuitive in that it overlooks the thousands of Muslims residing within US borders willing to or already planning attacks on American citizens.(3) 

Trump's line of thinking also brings to light the costly pointlessness of military action in Syria and why immigration bans and deportation of Muslims is the better, and less bloody, choice for the Western world.

US and allied military could kill every living thing in Raqqa, turning the entire city to glass, with zero effect on Islamic attacks in America and Europe.

Our inner walls have been inundated by the enemy. American towns and cities have been flooded with Islam's soldiers by the very Western governments bombing their homelands to oblivion.

Islam is building its caliphates in Europe and the Unites States, not only in lands long ago lost to the perversions of Arabic culture. 
 

With millions of American Muslims, and Muslims in America, attempting to join ISIS or empathetic to Sharia and Islamic jihad, the US, itself, would ironically meet the criteria for Trump's immigration ban as a “key instigator of Islamic terrorism”.

How could we ban thousands of militant Muslims from the US already residing in the US? This returns us to the absurd concept of “good” and “bad” followers of Islam. 

All of Islam is “bad” in that it seeks destruction of Western values. All Muslims must, therefore, subscribe to an anti-Western ideology to follow the tenants of Islam.

Time to go
Is the segregation of Islam from the United States an extreme strategy that will create an entire segment of persecuted citizens within our nation? Yes, but so too were our dealings with British monarchical authoritarianism in the eighteenth century and the collective tyrannies of Nazi socialism and communism in the twentieth century.

Islam is at war with Western civilization and handily winning thanks to our naive proclivity for globalism, multiculturalism, and the suicidal utopian pursuit of equality. 

Either cultures go to extremes to survive challenges to their existence or they cease to exist. The choice for Western civilization is to fight the encroachment of Islam, or die. What will be our choice? 

"America will become a dictatorship”
It is an incorrect supposition that America's forced breakup with Islam will turn our nation toward tyranny. The existence of Islam within our nation is turning us toward tyranny. We did not become a dictatorship after the defeat and forced expulsion of the British Empire. 

We did not become an amalgamation of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, or Soviet Russia after defeating the ideologies of those nation's disastrous political experiments.

Like our eighteenth and twentieth century counterparts, Twenty first century Americans cannot be labeled tyrants when warring for freedom, liberty, and the preservation of our secular supreme law ("US Constitution" for you Obama supporters) anymore than the earliest Americans became tyrants for expelling monarchical absolutism from the shores of the thirteen colonies. 

The allied twentieth century wars against nationalism and communism targeted all of Nazi Socialism, Japanese Imperialism, and Soviet Communism. An approach that led to the overwhelming defeat of those deadly, parasitic ideologies wherever on the planet they managed a foothold.

Conclusion
Islam is completely incompatible with Western civilization's concepts of freedom and individual liberty (as France's 6.5 million Muslim population has repeatedly shown).(4) 

Muslims must be reintegrated into the Arabic and Persian worlds to find solutions to their political, economic, and theocratic differences for the sake of our domestic security and cultural preservation.

The Western world did not create the abomination of Islam and is not responsible for its existence or demise. Muslims are accountable for the normalization of their violent, irrational belief system which must be moderated, undoubtedly with tremendous amounts of blood, outside of Western lands.

(1) Islam's peace: Dead, one cannot be anymore “at peace”.

(2) Muslims immigrating to the West are not socially and economically integrating into society but creating segregated Islamic enclaves, Muslim territories within Western nations. 

(3) There are reportedly 3 to 3.5 million Muslims residing in the United States, according to government statistics. Of those 15 - 25% are considered "radical" by standards fronted by the US intelligence community.

(4) France, a nation of 66 million, has a Muslim population of 6.5 million, twice that of the US. This, of curse, according to dated, pre-refugee crisis 2014 statistics. Of France's 67,500 person prison population, 47,250 prisoners are Muslim (70%). Muslim incarceration rate per 100k people in France: 727.2 Muslims vs 34.0 non-Muslims. 63% of French citizens believe that Islam is not compatible with French values. So much for Western “democracy”.

NOT "ISIS". ISLAM

While awaiting a statement from President Obama, to blame guns and large trucks for the latest terror attack in France, distinguished members of the zombie media speculate on what "organization" will take credit for the murder of dozens celebrating Bastille Day in Nice. 

The only terror group responsible for these attacks is the one followed by 1.6 billion Muslims, and growing, throughout the world: Islam. 

Where there are Muslims there is Islamic terrorism. Where there are more Muslims, there is more Islamic terrorism. Where the are no Muslims there is still crime, tragedy, mass killings, and possible political violence, but there is not event, after event, after event of Islamic terrorism, to the extent the Western world is now experiencing, solely attributable to the mass importation of irrational, low IQ animals from humanity's biggest theistic mistake. 

Islam has no place in Western society. How many more innocent people have to die before moronic, liberal Western governments end their suicidal love affair with Muslims and Islam? 

Tell your political leaders stop trying to moderate genocidal Islam with our blood. Citizens of the Western world do not have an obligation to die for the politically correct intentions of multiculturalism, globalization, or the absurd and fatal utopian concept of equality. 

Liberals, Stop Crediting The NRA For Your Losses On Gun Control

 

Last week elderly Democrats littered the US House floor protesting their inability to extra-legally deprive Americans of protection from criminal deadly force with firearms. 

Most annoying about these Democrat displays of geriatric discontent, against public will, is their regurgitated theme of 'NRA holding insurmountable power over Republican members of Congress'. 

This misguided supposition overlooks how millions of gun-owning, freedom-loving Americans in firearms heritage, hunting, gun manufacturing, weapons and operations training, shooting sports, weapon accessories, and ammunition production mobilize into political action each time gun control is brought to a congressional committee or floor of the US House or Senate. 

So liberals, stop giving the NRA all of our credit. The NRA is a powerful voice in defeating your shameful efforts to permanently disarm the American public, but not the determining factor in Republican refusal to vote on gun control. 

The will and political activism of the gun-friendly American public deserves majority recognition for defeated progressive liberal efforts against guns, not simply the NRA.   

This Is My Rifle

This is my rifle, and yes it IS an assault weapon.  Why do I have it? To protect my family, my community, and my country. Protect from what, you ask? Whoever or whatever is stupid enough to threaten any of the aforementioned. Is it a weapon of war? Not unless pressed by idiotic progressive liberal tyrants who prefer disarming peaceful Americans to expelling Islamic savages. 

Any more dumb questions?